mato_d - valali, teraz sa valaju (t.j. zase bez vyuzitia) u stryka v BA, ktory ich mozno raz pouzil s Pentax 10D. Boli povodne k zrkadlu Praktisix (stredoformat ?) a presny nazov vyrobcu MeyerOptik Gorlitz. Ak mas pre nich vyuzitie (a bicepsy :D), tak sa mozem opytat za kolko evry su na predaj.

Mat, a co cinkaren zriadujes alebo astrofoto? hadanka, co to je: cierne to je, cca 3500g dlzka 40cm a nie je to cierne decko? :D
fuwen.net/index.php?option=co…

Mato, a kto Ti ten bokeh predava? :D

Martin - valaju, alebo valali? Konkretne by ma zaujimala ta 500/5.6
Inak luxus fotka. Taky bokeh - to je na nezaplatenie... :) 5b.

Tiež by som túto foto skôr zaradil už do umeleckej fotografie.. Veľmi sa mi páči, že to má atmosféru...

Rasto, no mne sa valali doma 2 archivne kusy 300/4 a 500/5.6, nejake vychodonemecke verzie Zeissa, odhadom zo 60tych, 70tych rokov 20.storocia. Ale kto by to vlacil po kopcoch. Tvoj 200/2.8 je zda sa este celkom kompaktny.

Neviem aky mladsi chces, ale podla tohto co som nasiel, doma pozriem na cislo, kedy ta zelezna rura bola pozvarana :D

"This Zeiss Sonnar lens 200mm f2.8 has been constructed only in a relative small quantity and all based on the same lens calculation dateing from 29.04.77. All these lenses were produced with a M42 mount. However I did not undestand, if this lens is for a medium format cammera. If yes, is it possible to change the mount to put on an Pentacon 6 mount for example? Does somebody know about it? The serial numbers from this lens are from 10.227.907 to 10.954.978 for the production from 1977 until 80. At the begin of the 80"s the serial numbers got reset to 1001 and there has been a production from 1984 to 1989 with serial numbers from 1001 to 6901."

urcite ta prva lepsia, tato mi moc nesadla...

Ano, abstraktne umenie ;-). Jednotka sa mi viacej pacila. CA sa ti nedala na tych klasoch odfiltrovat? Ktovie ako by sa s nou vysporiadal nejaky o 20 rokov mladsi objektiv s kadejakymi ED clenmi.

rasto,to uz hranici s umeleckou fotofrafiou!!! proste naaaadhera!!!